|
Copy List
THE FLUORIDATION
CIRCUS
There are lots of
professional clowns in the Fluoridation Circus,
demonstrating their “slight of hand” manoeuvring of
fluoridation facts, accepted by most Australian
Parliaments and especially the bureaucrats who carry
the “can” for politicians.
Bureaucrats,
unelected by the population, seem to have more
authority and claimed knowledge than the elected
politicians who in most circumstances keep their
distance when fluoridation opponents confront them
asking for scientific information. But the
politicians lay down the law by their vote in
Parliament.
They send dental
and medical “experts” to front the public both in
person and the media.
Fluoridation, the
mass medicating of the population with NON licensed
fluoride chemicals that in fact could NOT and indeed
DO NOT pass Australian Pharmaceutical Laws.
Chemicals and
Medicine
Consider a recent
statement by a N.S.W. dental/fluoridation expert
speaking on behalf of the A.D.A. and the N.S.W.
Government, April 2003:
“The Therapeutic
Goods Administration (TGA) doesn’t classify
fluoridated water as a medication because the amount
of fluoride added to water supplies is one part per
million. That’s one part per million in water
compared to 1000 parts per million in fluoridated
toothpaste. So basically, fluoride is a chemical and
for chemicals we don’t really need to have informed
consent because that has been practiced in other
areas.”
There is a conflict
of scientific facts in that TGA quotation.
The TGA has
officially described medicine, 9th July, 2002:
“Medicine means:
(a) therapeutic
goods that are represented to achieve or are
likely to achieve, their principle intended action
by pharmacological, chemical, immunological
metabolic means in or on the body of a human.”
The United
Kingdom - “Practices of Medical Products”:
“Medicine:
Any substance or
combination of substances presented for healing or
preventing diseases in human beings or animals.”
Examine current and
historical fluoridation official data by the
Australian Governments, the A.M.A., A.D.A. all
Health Departments and Universities.
You will find every
group describe and promote fluoridation of public
drinking water in such a manner which classifies it
as a medicine solely by their claim of effect on
human beings.
Here we once again
have Government fluoridation experts expressing an
example of the Fluoridation Circus with unscientific
gobbledegook nonsense all in the name of an
“informed” N.S.W. Parliament.
Notwithstanding the
above frightening data on the TGA one can gain some
understanding of public protection from Regulatory
Agencies by just reading a local newspaper.
Charcoal Water
Filters do not Remove Fluoride
The continued
withdrawal of drugs off the market after being
allowed prescription use for humans and the
following serious side effects draws attention to
trusting “experts” to protect the people of
Australia.
The N.S.W.
dental/medical fluoridation expert stated in public
that if people do not want fluoride in their
drinking water supplies, they can remove the
fluoride with a Charcoal Filter.
When questioned
about that statement and challenging its scientific
correctness, because the questioner had contacted
most filter manufacturers in Australia to discover
not one filter manufacturer said charcoal filters
remove fluoride from fluoridated drinking water
supplies.
In reply the Doctor
said, “That is the decision of the N.S.W.
Government.”
The Fluoridation
Circus really does give great scientific
intellectually dishonest answers that seem based on
commercialism instead of the health of Australian
people and our pharmaceutical laws to protect
everyone accordingly.
Dishonest answers
that seem based on commercialism instead of the
health of Australian people.
A very serious and
important question about fluoridation is never
considered or seemingly never understood even in
learning institutions.
The expert
fluoridation travellers make statements such as the
above reference to the TGA.
“Fuoride is a
chemical and for chemicals we don’t really need to
have informed consent . . .”
Seems these
fluoridation experts don’t even know what chemicals
are according to drugs of all kinds.
Cyanide is a
chemical - does that mean it is exempt from the
POISON ACT?
Dose of Fluoride
not known - Safety not known
However the
dangerous ignorance is the “fact of dose”, a matter
that has never been answered after 60 years of
compulsory artificial fluoridation.
The second problem
is the inference that both fluoridated water and
fluoride toothpaste are safe, even though the dental
/ medical N.S.W. fluoridation expert cannot give any
scientific answer to the question of fluoride dose
of any one person in Australia.
Of course, we must
be fair in our criticism because no Government, no
doctor, no University, no dentist, not even
pharmaceutical organisations can state the amount of
fluoride ingested by each Australian citizen nor the
dose.
Fluoride
Accumulates in the Human Body
What is more
disturbing is the fact that it is agreed universally
world wide that fluoride accumulates in the human
body but no effort is made by the controlling
fluoride pushers for compulsory fluoride blood
testing.
The amount of
fluoride buildup in blood, bones and tissue is
unknown in Australia and in spite of such medical
and political scientific negligence, people in
privileged positions of trust show absolutely no
apparent interest even with the unacceptable state
of disease in the population.
Suggestion -
instead of all these experts promoting grand (?)
cures it would be of great benefit to all Australian
people if they used, as a token, just a little of
their time and not forgetting their jobs are at the
expense of Australian Taxpayers, and honestly looked
carefully for CAUSES!
Fluoride in the
blood could be a dramatic discovery and
understanding.
Don’t be mislead,
this is a problem carefully ignored and hidden by
those who should be concerned but are otherwise
protecting this fluoride poison.
Consider how
fluoride causes mottled teeth, its correct medical
name is “Fluorosis”.
If fluoride can
kill cells in dental enamel and so obviously, why is
this poisoning of children ignored by medical
science?
Reading and
studying today’s medical research, mostly into cures
and not causes, one wonders why medical research has
not concentrated on the general health of children
suffering fluorosis as they grow up into adulthood.
If fluoride can
kill cells in dental enamel and so obviously, why is
this poisoning of children ignored by medical
science?
Do politicians and
their health Departments think they are hiding the
fluoride problem?
We can assure them
the day has arrived.
Fluoridation is now
the “flavour of the year” and public information is
increasing rapidly, a matter that cannot be stopped
because those pushing fluoridation are chasing a
non-scientific baseless commercial medical concept
that depends on “slight of hand science and public
deception”.
What they learned
by history is repeated over many years.
Copy List
|
