By Glen S.R. Walker
"Sweep down the cobwebs at worn-out beliefs* And
throw your soul wide open to the light Of Reason and
Ella Wheeler, 1883
Most countries of
the world have fought wars for their independence
This has not
happened in Australia, resulting in few people
really interested in the Constitution governing our
constitutional freedoms, which are whittled away in
a covert typical political manner, unseen, unheard
and seldom published for community perusal.
Australia - "The Lucky Country", where people do not
care, even though the rights of the people are
separated from the Constitution by politicians and
parliaments, contrary to "the will of the people"
and the Law.
A rule book
can be ignored, bent misquoted, or indeed hidden,
BUT a Constitution is an insurance policy that
governs without interference -
EMBODIES JUSTICE, DEMOCRACY AND LAW, WITH
COMPLIANCE BY ALL PEOPLE IN ALL PLACES AT ALL
overcomes ignorance is knowledge and the object of
knowledge is TRUTH. A free person lives uprightly
ful filing his obligations to family, community,
nation and God. By contrast, a person given over
to his appetites and passions, a person who scoffs
at truth and chooses to live, whether openly or
secretly, in defiance of the moral law is not free
- he is simply a different kind of slave."
George, Princeton University, 2003)
"It is error
alone which needs the support of Government, Truth
can stand by itself."
Australian Constitution took effect on 1st
What has been
described as 'the sovereignty of the Australian
people' is also recognised by Section 128 which
provides that any change to the Constitution must
be approved by the people of Australia."
Australian Constitution is the single most
important document in Australia's history. It is
the legal and political foundation on which our
nation is built and functions."
Margaret Reid, President of Senate; Daryl
Williams, Attorney General: Neil Andrews,
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
between Commonwealth and State Powers
"One of the
principal reasons for this is Section 109 of the
Constitution which provides that if a valid
Commonwealth law is inconsistent with a law of a
State Parliament, the Commonwealth law operates
and the State law is invalid to the extent of the
Court is the final Court of Appeal within
Australia in all types of cases."
Constitution is the single most important document
in Australia's history."
President of the Australian Senate
Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution,
have power to make laws for peace, order and good
government of the Commonwealth with respect to:
Section 51 (xxiiiA)
and dental services but not so as to authorise any
form of conscription ..."
Conscription is a
case of force, which clearly defines compulsory mass
medication of a community with artificial
fluoridation, pumped into every home, drugging the
occupants 24 hours every day of their lives without
recourse of any kind, nor scientific evidence that
the ingested fluoride chemical is safe for humans.
chemicals used in fluoridation plants are sodium
silico-fluoride and hydrofluorosilicic acid. These
are toxic pollutants collected in the chimneys of
fertiliser factories. The fluoride chemical is so
toxic it is not permitted by law to exhaust into the
atmosphere, but is collected for dumping into
drinking water supplies, indeed that is the only
legal method of disposing of these poisonous
by-products of superphosphate production!
Common Law is part
of the Constitution, covering laws of chemicals,
poisons and drugs.
chemicals and chemical products are all rated
accordingly under the Poison Act of each State and
overlooked by the Commonwealth Therapeutic Goods
Administration, National Drugs and Poisons Schedule
In accordance with
consumption by humans, each such product must have a
licence to sell, use or prescribe for humans, based
on proven scientifically documented data on "proof"
of human safety.
The "proof of
safety" for fluoridation has been debated
continuously since the 1930's when fluoridation was
first suggested. That is over 70 years!
In the beginning,
the greatest opposition to the use of fluorides for
humans, came from the U.S. Medical and Dental
However, time and
money changed the principles of pharmacology and
today the leading advocates of fluoridation are the
same A.M.A. and A.D.A.
Only last year,
after 70 years, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and the Environment Protection
Authority stated in the U.S. Senate to a question
relating to the known and proven safety of sodium
silicofluoride and fluorosilicic acid used in
fluoridation plants that - neither have seen any
scientific data proving the human safety of these
Neither the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration or the Environment
Protection Authority have seen any scientific data
proving the human safety of sodium silicofluoride or
stated they have never had an application for safety
approval of the chemicals.
Laws of Australia prohibit the use of chemicals or
chemical products (drugs) without approval of the
Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and
only then, when proper proof of safety to humans is
scientifically documented and demonstrated.
No such proof has
ever been produced in Australia, so that until
documented, with detailed scientific proof of
safely, fluoridation is a prohibited process.
chemicals used hi fluoridation have been identified
as a drug (Edinburgh Court 1980).
During 1992 the
Australian High Court ruled that a medical doctor's
duty, as a prescriber of a drug, must be to advise
the patient of any dangers or side effects from the
proposed medical treatment. _ _
The A.M.A. supports
the use of compulsory fluoridation.
Therapeutic Goods Administration (A.T.G.) defines
goods that are represented to achieve their
principal intended action by pharmacological
chemical, immunological or metabolic means in or
on the body of a human." (Therapeutic Goods
That is an official
description of a compulsory fluoridation qualifies
A.M.A., A.D.A. and all Australian universities who
teach students that "fluoridation achieves changes
in the structure of teeth", are promoting an
unproven medical process by action, with safety
A.T.G. Advertising Code, July 2003
advertisement for therapeutic goods must:
(a) comply with
the Statute and common law of the Commonwealth,
States and Territories.
correct and balanced statements only and claims
which the sponsor has already verified (by
advertisement for therapeutic goods must not:
(i) Contain any
claims, statement or implication that the goods
are safe or that their use cannot cause harm or
that they have no side effects."
Government Department of Human Services (Health
Department) advertise in literature that
fluoridation is "a safe method of prevention of
That statement is
made without published scientific evidence of
safety, published in world recognised scientific
journals, and endorsed by such authorities as the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration after proper
investigation of claims, none of which are
"The voluntary consent
of the human subject is absolutely essential."
Nuremburg Military Tribunal
Australian Constitution follows the official
conclusions of the Nuremberg Court 1949, documenting
the Nuremberg Code, agreed to by most countries
The voluntary consent of the human subject is
("Trials of War
Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunal
under Control Law 10, 1949).
guilty of experimenting on human beings were
sentenced to death by hanging."
governments have been experimenting on their
population with fluoridation for over 50 years
despite being a signatory to the Nuremberg Code.
During the 50 years
there has never been any proper scientific evidence
supporting the claim that fluoridation is safe and
effective, but evidence that compulsory fluoridation
is unconstitutional, some say even criminal by
forcing unknown doses of fluoride into homes
Each year the
"Don't Care Australian Population" present the
Australian parliaments, their politicians,
bureaucrats, 'working scientists", health and drug
organisations, Government health departments, with
an open sesame to do as they like or are instructed,
all without normal accountability or "correct"
scientific investigations on behalf of the
Victorian Government 1993, passing a new
Fluoridation Act which included an amendment to the
Victorian Constitution, which now "Prohibits the
Supreme Court of Victoria from entertaining cases
against fluoridation". (Victorian Constitution)
The law which
defines regulations concerning appeals to tfie High
Court of Australia must first be processed through
the State Supreme Court.
blocking" activity relative to fluoridation in the
Supreme Court, it prohibits application to the High
Court of Australia.
Yes, this really is
an Australian "democratic" practice of a Parliament
in its dealing with Compulsory Fluoridation!
The Act was passed
unanimously by all Victorian political parties, all
without any debate and not a report on that action
by any media. Wonder why?
The Minister for
Health, Mrs Tehan, Liberal Member, explained:
Fluoridation Act should not be prevented from
doing so by actions before a Court." (Hansard,
28th October, 1993, p. 1474)
Democracy and the
Constitution deploys courts of law to administer
justice, but compulsory mass medication, with public
fluoridated drinking water supplies, compulsorily
pumped into every home, must not enter the
constitutional legal arena or indeed any arena of
medical and pharmaceutical organisations.
Not a word of
question or condemnation from "high places of
do-gooders", or legal constitutional authorities
about the changing of the Victorian Constitution to
Seems we have
inherited a new kind of Political Power, so
undemocratic it ignores the Australian Constitution
and the rights of the people.
Perhaps we are hard
to please, relative to politicians, but seems
Australian politicians are following their
counterparts as reported in the Herald-Sun
6th December 2003.
The Foot and Mouth
prize to U.S. Defence Secretary in an indecipherable
press debriefing which ended with:
also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we
This has all the
intelligence of fluoridation promoters in Australia,
where authorities are always reviewing, but never
doing, anything under the Government's Minister for
Fluoridation is the
scientific Peter Pan in the Never Never Land of
politics and science - it never grows out of its
childish beliefs except money from tooth fairies.
books on fluoridation, we find current questions to
dentists, doctors, scientists, universities and the
Never Never Land politicians, were being asked by
Dr. Waldbott, a leading authority on allergy to
fluorides, and recorded in his book, "A Struggle
with Titans" 1965, and the same refusal to reply by
people in responsible public positions.
George Orwell put
the above in fine words:
given moment there is a sort of all-prevailing
orthodoxy, a general tacit agreement not to
discuss some large and uncomfortable fact."
A gabble of
dentists and fluoride promoters make noises that
influences only politicians, but the amount of
unrefuted scientific fluoridation data, which shows
the dangers and ineffectiveness of fluoridation,
circulating around the world including Australia, is
so positive and unequivocal that only a simpleton
could dismiss it, but perhaps that is the real
political and scientific situation we are