|

Copy List
Fluoridation - the Great Political
and Scientific Hoax
by Glen S.R. Walker
Purity in words, also in water
quality, should be the aim of every person concerned
with the health and freedom of the Australian
people.
Purity of thinking is the key to all
good, and anything to the contrary is an
illegitimate fundamental falsity of pseudo pretence
by those involved in compulsory mass medicating the
population with fluoride chemicals.
Purity of drinking water supplies has
become a worldwide scientific sham, a pretence of
knowledge and care in the interest of people,
regulated and under control of politicians voted
into Parliament to not only serve the people but
give purity of representation accordingly.
Purity of expression, relative to
compulsory mass medicating a population with
fluoridated water, and polluting with Unregistered
and Unlicenced chemicals, is clouded with a turbid
collection of disorder, untenable in the rules of
science, completely lacking purity of expression in
medicine, commonsense and indeed pharmacology.
Universally, fluoridation science, as
pronounced by the fluoride lobby and its followers,
supported by all Australian Governments to their
disgrace, receive zero out of ten, for purity of
their action against the Australian population.
Purity of thinking is the key to
all good, anything to the contrary is an
illegitimate fundamental falsity of pseudo
pretence.
Chemistry is the science of purity
that has now been seriously polluted by commercial
interference, the fight for the mighty dollar that
seems capable of even changing the sacred principles
of pure chemistry and commonsense pharmacology.
Purity and honesty of thought and
action are a partnership in the order of principle,
a natural heritage of all people, allotted by nature
in a manner of omnipotence.
Sadly, the legendary fluoridation
myths promoted by fanatics with their choice of
commercial sorcery, rather than purity of thought
and action, have become the norm in these days of
chasing the covert dollar, with pseudo science as
their status of cleverness and a cover-up of their
poor science, including the failure of fluoridation,
all with their hand-over-heart promises and claims
relative to fluoridation.
We are witnessing a replay of the
past wonderfully safe home use of D.D.T. and all
those other safe poisons for human use, commercially
presented with Government approval, but found to be
the absolute opposite of the presentation by
"experts", indeed so many less toxic than fluoride,
but none so commercially and politically powerful,
as the process of polluting all drinking water
supplies with an Unlicenced toxic waste
disposal pollutant from fertiliser factory exhaust
chimneys.
One can imagine that people of pure
honest thinking would admit the utter failure of
fluoridation.
The evidence is so clear, but cannot
penetrate the entrenched thinking of politicians and
scientists who cannot, for reasons not understood in
an environment of purity of character, accept
obvious facts.
The failure of
fluoridation
The Federal Parliament
is voicing much concern by quoting 500,000
Australians waiting 5 years and more for urgent
dental treatment at taxpayers cost.
One can imagine that people of pure
honest thinking would admit the utter failure of
fluoridation, especially as Australia is officially
rated as over 80% of the population is drinking
fluoridated water.
Notwithstanding such dental disease
in Australia, the dental decay factor is increasing,
according to the official 1999 Report of the
Australian Institute of Health, showing dental decay
increasing by over 22% in children who are also
drinking fluoridated water.
Medical Code of Ethics
All members of the Australian Medical
Association should consider and indeed respect their
Code of Ethics 1992 which states:
(1)
"Evaluate your patient completely and thoroughly."
Their Code of Ethics is medically
meaningless when officially coupled to the A.M.A. in
their endorsement and promotion of compulsory
artificial fluoridation, all without one iota of
scientific proof that it is safe and the added fact
that the fluoride water medicine is made up with
NON-REGISTERED and NON-LICENCED fluoride chemicals,
producing a daily drugging of a population without
medical examinations or evaluating each person and
all without pharmaceutical quality drugging.
Fluoridation is a pretending medical
science.
Code of Ethics 3
"Treat your patient (the community)
with compassion and respect for human dignity."
Is compulsory medication with
artificial fluoridation, "compassion and respect",
and is there any dignity in being daily drugged with
unregistered and non-licensed industrial poisonous
pollutant collected in exhaust chimneys of
fertiliser factories?
Code of Ethics 6
"Build a professional basis on
integrity and ability."
The common understanding and
expectation is that "ability" is based on
"integrity" which is only obtainable from purity of
thinking, action and behaviour.
Advertising Code of the Australian
Therapeutic Goods
Government Departments never stop
producing grand new rules relating to the health of
Australian people.
The rules of the Australian
Therapeutic Goods (ATG) Advertising Code 2000
states:
''Solid evidence will be
required before products can be advertised.
Consumers have got to know products actually
deliver" (deliver means
effective)
Problems follow these new A.T.G.
Advertising Codes, which if and as they should be
accepted as Law, makes fluoridation their first
casualty.
There are no scientific studies
recorded in appropriate literature proving
artificial fluoridation is safe and no person can be
harmed.
There are no scientific studies
recorded in appropriate literature proving
artificial fluoridation is safe.
The
strongest scientific, health, medical and
pharmaceutical situation making dangerous nonsense
of the A.T.G. Code is the FACT that the fluoride
chemicals used in Australia to fluoridate the
drinking water supplies are:
-
Sodium Silicofluoride
-
Hydrofluorosilicic Acid
Neither of these chemicals are
registered and licensed for human use in drinking
water supplies.
This was established in the U.S.
Senate 2001 when the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and the E.P.A., were questioned in the Senate
regarding the Registration of these fluoride
chemicals for human use.
Both the E.P.A. and the F.D.A.
declared neither has any recorded evidence of safety
nor any evidence of any such application for
REGISTRATION.
Deception of Scientific Fact
Purity of action concerning the above
fluoride chemicals is muddied in a turbid
conglomerate of scientific, medical, political and
legal flummoxed science in the extreme.
Our Constitution is a document of
original purity of thinking, but today it is
polluted in definition cowboy politicians and their
statesmen of totalitarian quality.
Compliance is a foreign requisite of
these people.
On New Year's Day 2001, the message
by the Prime Minister of Australia, Mr John Howard,
said:
"Australia is a Nation of
Freedom and Individual Liberty."
There is no justice, freedom or
liberty in compulsory medicating the population with
toxic waste pollutant from fertiliser factories,
especially as the Government knows the fluoride
chemicals are NOT REGISTERED for human use in
drinking water supplies and the chemicals are also
contaminated with lead, arsenic and other prohibited
products.
Do you consider the scientifically,
intellectually dishonest claims of fluoridation
safety, fits into the Prime Minister's description
of freedom and liberty for all Australian people?
There seems a complete lack of
cooperation with those actually involved: The
People.
The previous Australian
Fluoridation News March/April 2004 was a
treatise on The Australian Constitution and
fluoridation.
A copy was sent to the Prime
Minister, the Australian Attorney-General, Minister
for Health and all Heads of States asking for their
opinion on the facts presented.
We received ONE reply to which
further reference will be made, even though we
offered space in our publication for their printed
report.
When dealing with fluoridation, it is
important to seek information from the highest
authority in the land, so a written request was sent
to the Australian Therapeutic Goods (A.T.G.) asking
for their data in approval of Sodium Silicofluoride
and Hydrofluorosilicic Acid for humans, dispensed to
the public via the kitchen tap.
More letters requesting a reply have
failed to get an answer!
The same experience is published in
Australian Fluoridation News Sept./Oct. 2002,
showing our correspondence with John Thwaites,
Victorian Minister of Health and the lack of
answering questions on fluoridation.
How can a health process be promoted
by Governments with such savage purpose without the
necessary science to support their claims and
promises which have never eventuated?!
Fluoridation is a falsity of
fictional pseudo pretence.
In effect we are fighting untouchable
"ghosts" in a manner befitting the Government
promoters.
GHOSTS
(Oxford Dictionary)
"bright spot on secondary image
in the field of telescope (fluoridation) due
to defect in lens".
The purity of thought is having
proper knowledge and expanding it for human
benefit, but scientific logic is missing in claims
by dentists and Governments that dental decay is
more evident in non-fluoridated communities.
"Their assumption is a deception
of scientific fact because they, the promoters,
cannot and do not even attempt to isolate the
presumed fluoride factor from so many other
factors influencing caries incidents."
(Rudolph Ziegelbecker, 1983)
Copy List
 |