|
Copy List
THE STATE OF FLUORIDATION
The U.S.A., Home of Fluoridation, first
commenced fluoridation in 1945 with no prior artificial fluoridation
scientific data on its safety or effectiveness.
It started exactly just after the
International Nuremburg Court declared (and has never been challenged) its
“Code”, the following relative to medical experimentation on humans.
“The voluntary consent of the human
subject is absolutely essential.”
The voluntary consent of the population has
never been given in Australia!
The following 60 years of clap-trap
fluoridation flummoxed science but financially successful, providing
lucrative positions and scientifically important status, supported by
Aluminium Smelters and Fertiliser Manufacturers.
Aboard the fluoridation gravy train,
travelling the world selling claims of dental decay obliteration by the
simple method of: just add some fluoride chemical to public drinking water
supplies and force every person to daily drink the fluoride chemical shandy.
The U.S. medical fluoridation principle is
compulsorily drugging people in their own homes, 24 hours each day, all
their lives, with a lawless drug practice of compulsion medication, with no
medical health investigation of any person in the population.
Most importantly, the fluoride DOSE is
uncontrollable, because it is only governed by each person’s individual
thirst, which in turn is governed by extraordinary differences in each one’s
way of life, age, health, occupation, sport and environment.
The answer given to the above data by
Fluoridation Experts and promoters (you know them) is that the control of
the individual dose is the amount of fluoride in the drinking water supply!
Medical Terror
That standard of their “expert”
fluoridation pseudo science develops into a situation of medical terror.
(Australian Fluoridation News, Jan 2002, “The Terror of Forced Fed
Fluoridation”).
Terror it is, when Governments, as well as
Medical and Dental Organisations, declare a RATE (amount) of a chemical in a
solution is a DOSE, when the DOSE (amount) of ingested fluoride is UNKNOWN!
On that basis a world industry of
unbelievable deception on the effects on health was - is, established all
based on unproven medical science, supported and recommended by the very
person you voted into Parliament, to honestly and responsibly represent you
and your family
The problem is serious but so easily
confirmed.
Fluoridation - A world industry of
unbelievable deception on the effects on health.
Just ask your political member to supply
you directly in his own words and knowledge, if fluoridation has been
scientifically proved safe, the data published in world scientific
literature (not Dental Association reports), all having been through the
usual refereed process.
Booklet of Unsubstantiated Claims
Beware of the “scientific study” data they
plaster around Australia:
“There are 1000 studies in 20 countries
proving fluoridation is beneficial to everyone throughout life.”
That is an example of what they call an
honest fluoridation fact, printed in a Booklet, delivered by POST in
Victoria to all Gippsland homes.
It also contained a letter by Dr. Robert
Hall, Chief Health Officer, Victorian Health Services.
That published official Government
statement of “their dental science” supporting their fluoridation programme
is a heap of absolute misinformation, deceitful, unsubstantiated claims, and
so ridiculed by Gippsland people, the Government removed it from the
propaganda Booklet to all Wodonga homes.
The local Wodonga paper, The Post,
published a statement, September 2005, by the same Dr. Hall, Director of
Human Services, rejecting our claim that the above (1000 studies in 20
countries) misinformation was removed from the Wodonga Government Booklet on
Fluoridation.
The Victorian Health Supremo, Dr. Hall, was
reported as saying:
“All care is taken to make sure the facts
were right.”
He also claimed:
“Both copies of the fluoridation booklet
were the same.”
Strange pronouncements by the Director of
Health, even the covers of the booklets are different! Our report of
alterations are correct.
In their booklet the Health Department
included (p. 11) a list of “scientific bodies who supported fluoridation”.
The National Health and Medical Research Council was included as a supporter
of fluoridation.
The N.H.M.R.C. in a letter 25th August,
2005, stated:
“The N.H. and M.R.C. does not have a
separate formal statement about fluoridation of drinking water and, as
such, neither supports nor criticises fluoridation of drinking water
supplies.”
Another community group used as endorsement
for fluoridation is the National Arthritis Advisory Group. That Arthritis
Group wrote 26th August, 2005, that:
“The National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal
Condition Advisory Group has not discussed fluoridation and has no position
on fluoridation.”
From the point of view of the fluoride
pushers, it does not matter, there are plenty of other names we will use!
In their great Blue Book the Government
Health Department claim that in the past 25 years, fluoridation has saved
the Victorian community nearly $1 billion dollars in “avoided dental costs,
lost productivity and saved leisure”.
Great commercial style sales junk and
without one skerrick of scientific evidence.
Fluoride Toothpaste - a Multi-Billion
Dollar Industry
Perhaps the answer to the serious health
proposition of compulsory artificial fluoridation is in one paragraph of the
Australasian Science, September 2005, p.32:
“The oral health industry supports the
activities of more than 500,000 dentists globally, and generates $23
billion sales in toothpaste annually as well as $3.5 billion sales in
mouth-wash.”
There will be no shortage of money for
promoting these fluoride products!
- Is there a dental decay-free population
in any fluoridated Country of the world? NO
- Is there a dental decay-free population
in any fluoridated City in the world? NO
- Is there a dental decay-free population
in any fluoridated town in the world? NO
Therefore, all the 60 years of fluoridation
sorcery should be relegated to children’s mythical fairy tale books.
Copy List
|
